Discuz! Board's Archiver

am5uh5gzdg 發表於 2013-5-30 19:23

women s yoga clothing until now

ar call from the Oval Office Tuesday evening. But a climate bill with a real carbon cap still faces an uphill struggle in Congress. Republicans have almost uniformly been against cap-and-trade, and there s little evidence that the oil spill has changed their minds; Lindsey Graham,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]women s yoga clothing[/url], the South Carolina Republican who was once a leading advocate of climate action in the Senate, has said that he would vote against the Kerry-Lieberman bill in part because the legislation contained some restrictions on offshore drilling. And expanded offshore drilling was considered to be one of the few carrots Democrats could offer Republicans on climate and energy policy—that s now clearly off the table, leaving the two sides with little to negotiate over. Obama may be ready to make his case and the American public may be ready to hear him, but won t necessarily add up to 60 votes in the Senate—even after the Gulf of Mexico has been turned into an oil slick. A more realistic option might be a big that puts aside a carbon price and focuses exclusively on energy policy—like the one introduced last week by Republican Senator Richard Lugar.But most climate experts are skeptical that a pared-down, energy-only bill will be ambitious enough to make a difference on climate change. This might be Obama s last and best change to make a difference on climate change and energy,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon online discount[/url], at least in this term. An ambitious climate and energy package might require a little sacrifice from Americans as we move beyond petroleum, but after weeks of staring at their TVs and watching the horror from the Gulf,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]fashion lulu[/url], Americans might be ready to do more than eat Louisiana seafood and play a round of golf in Florida. Van Jones, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and Obama s former green jobs czar, put it right on Monday:People actually just want to be called to service: “What are we supposed to do, Mr. President? And we will do it.” That’s what’s missing.Obama has shown that he can blame. Now he has to lead.Whaling hasn t had an overwhelming surge of global support since the days of oil lamps and corsets, but the eastern hemisphere s tolerance for Japan s ongoing hunt is wearing particularly thin these days.The latest to jump ship is Palau, a Pacific island a few thousand miles south of Tokyo which has backed Japan in its exploitation of a loophole in the global whaling moratorium that allows nations to hunt whales in the name of science. Palau, which does not whale itself, joined the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 2002 and has, until now, been a supporter of Japan s research program — and a recipient of Japanese aid.The announcement of Palau s president that it would reconsider its position came hot on the heels of a June 13 Sunday Times article that reported several small nations admitted or considered receiving cash or gifts from Japan to win their votes to end the 24-year-old commercial ban on whaling in the upcoming meeting of the IWC. Japan promptly denied the allegations.Palau isn t exactly a lone ranger in its opposition. Japan and Australia have been locking horns on the issue since last month, when Canberra said it would take Tokyo to the International Court of Justice for flouting international law by continuing to hunt whales in Antarctic waters. The move followed a tumultuous season, when Japan whaling ships clashed several times with anti-whaling activists in what has become an annual scuffle in the southern seas. Japan rejected Australia s warning, calling it a ploy ahead of campaign season.Having lived in Iceland in 2006 when that island nation decided to resume its own scientific whaling program to much of the world s dismay, it s hard for me personally to understand why nations with bigger fish to fry are willing to risk so much political capital with their trading partners to fight what looks, to most of the world, like a losing battle. The continuing hunt for the endangered stocks of bluefin tuna may be wrong, but at least opponents can grudgingly acknowledge there is a economic and gastronomic incentive worth fightingRelated articles:

  
[url=http://www.guzhencc.org/home/space.php?uid=126593&do=blog&id=94752]http://www.guzhencc.org/home/space.php?uid=126593&do=blog&id=94752[/url]
  
[url=http://gallery.robertpattinson.org/displayimage.php?pid=39854&message_id=ab9dedbf7ca93759fdbddfb6fff39b83&message_icon=info#cpgMessageBlock]http://gallery.robertpattinson.org/displayimage.php?pid=39854&message_id=ab9dedbf7ca93759fdbddfb6fff39b83&message_icon=info#cpgMessageBlock[/url]
  
[url=http://note.vita-cantabile.org/2009/04/10212647.html#comments]http://note.vita-cantabile.org/2009/04/10212647.html#comments[/url]

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.